Connect with us


Destiny gave Raj Thackeray an option of a lifetime and he chose to squander it




At a time when the Shiv Sena is remaining panned still left, appropriate and centre and rightly so, a person guy has been conspicuous by his stoic silence. Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) Main Raj Thackeray who rebranded his political outfit in January in an endeavor to declare Balasaheb Thackeray’s Hindutva legacy, appears to have long gone into hibernation. The simple fact that Raj Thackeray has squandered a golden option to corner the Shiv Sena has elevated really a couple eyebrows in the condition.

Ever because its formation, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena has positioned alone as a Maratha centric party, which after original achievements in Nagpur, has fizzled out into oblivion with the celebration picking out to not contest the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Just after vociferously campaigning against the BJP and flirting with the Sharad Pawar led NCP, Raj Thackeray-led MNS was at the crossroads immediately after securing only a one seat in the Maharashtra elections. Shiv Sena’s backstabbing of the BJP and deciding on to ally with the INC and NCP meant Shiv Sena to lose its Hindutva ideology as political collateral to make Uddhav Thackeray the Chief Minister.

Raj Thackeray wasted no time to fill the vacuum left by the Shiv Sena and rebranded the MNS from its earlier Maratha-centric outlook to now a occasion perceivably committed to Hindutva in a enormous rally on January 23. Thackeray was heading from energy to power as his responses on the CAA were being specially perfectly gained on the correct side of Indian politics and he continued to pan the Maharashtra authorities all through the original period of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.

However, at a time when the Uddhav Thackeray led Shiv Sena is arguably going through 1 of its toughest issues, the man who still left the Shiv Sena in 2006, is boosting eyebrows by his silence. So why is Raj Thackeray silent?

Probably one of the reasons could be the actuality that Raj Thackeray also shares friendly relations with the bigwigs of Bollywood thanks to his time with the Shiv Sena. The cordial relations in the Bollywood has potentially stopped Raj Thackeray to give his two cents on the Sushant Singh Rajput investigation or the vendetta politics performed out by the Shiv Sena from Kangana Ranaut – who despite becoming a Bollywood actor is fiercely anti-Bollywood.

A further rationale could be the actuality that there has been a thaw concerning the cousins, Raj and Uddhav Thackeray and he could want to seize the Shiv Sena’s core voter base, and he would absolutely not want the party to be obliterated.

Make no mistake, the mess that the Shiv Sena finds itself is of the Thackerays personal creating. Raj Thackeray would not have refrained from attacking the Maharashtra govt, but attacking the Shiv Sena is a distinctive factor altogether. It is effectively identified that Aaditya Thackeray is close to the coronary heart of Raj Thackeray and possibly having a pro-CBI stance in the investigation of Sushant Singh Rajput would have put Aaditya in a location.

It is clear that had the crisis which is becoming seasoned by Maharashtra been the building of the Maha Vikas Aghadi as a complete, Raj Thackeray would have wasted no time in placing the point out federal government in a location with his sharp retorts. However, this time all-around, the buck stops at Uddhav and Aaditya Thackeray which maybe describes Raj Thackeray’s silence.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading