Connect with us


I am stunned that P Chidambaram is shocked about draconian anti-FOE regulation by Kerala govt




I am shocked that P Chidambaram is shocked about draconian anti-FOE law by Kerala govt

Former Union Minister P Chidambaram is shocked. As the mercury dipped in the nationwide money, P Chidambaram took to social media to claim that Kerala government’s get to make ‘offensive’ post on social media punishable by 5 decades in jail has stunned him.

This shock seasoned by P Chidambaram has stunned me, to set it mildly.

*Cough* Sec 66A of IT Act *cough*

It was in Oct 2012, when underneath the draconian segment 66A of the IT Act the then Union Finance Minister P Chidambaram’s son acquired a person arrested for “offensive” tweets in opposition to him. Regional Criminal offense Department of CID Police in Puducherry experienced gone to arrest then 45-12 months-old Ravi, proprietor of a plastic packing material manufacturing facility, for tweeting ‘offensive’ messages to Karti on a few instances from 2011.

Srinivasan had accused Karti of corruption. This is what Karti experienced tweeted in defence of getting a man arrested for accusing him of corruption.

Eight yrs down the line, Karti is going through investigation in selection of cases including cash laundering and possessing undisclosed overseas property.

The legislation was handed by P Chidambaram’s ‘zero loss‘ colleague, Kapil Sibal. Perhaps Congress leaders just did not want the aam janta to issue Congress leaders and their household associates in excess of allegations of corruption.

Area 66A of IT Act arrived into force in 2010. Ravi’s arrest primarily based on Karti’s complaint was 1 of the to start with incidents of arrest of someone about ‘freedom of expression’. The segment was punishable for up to a few decades in jail above social media posts which are ‘grossly offensive or has menacing character’. Possibly Chidambaram is shocked that Kerala govt place jail time of 5 years, two a long time much more than what they experienced stated.

That’s not it, even though. If you posted any info you understood to be false, but posted only to lead to ‘annoyance, inconvenience, risk, obstruction, insult, injury, prison intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will’, a non-bailable arrest warrant awaited you. How dare you trigger anyone annoyance or inconvenience about social media below non-fascist Congress rule? Right after all, is not Congress synonymous to independence of speech?

When passing this legislation, Sibal experienced claimed he did not intend to censor social media.

Just couple days after Karti received the businessman arrested, two girls in Palghar have been arrested for questioning the connect with for Mumbai bandh on death of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray’s death. All over again less than the Segment 66A of IT Act brought in by Kapil Sibal. Thackeray was head of a political outfit. In 2012, Maharashtra had a Congress-run governing administration. Decades afterwards, his son, Uddhav Thackeray would sign up for palms with Congress and NCP and variety the governing administration in Maharashtra.

Cartoonist Aseem Trivedi was arrested in Mumbai in September 2012, under area 66A of IT Act as well as various other provisions over allegations of ‘insulting’ the national emblem and drawing a cartoon. Talking of cartoons, a different politician who took an offence at her cartoon was West Bengal Main Minister Mamata Banerjee. A Jadavpur University professor was arrested in April 2012 for circulating ‘anti-Mamata’ cartoons.

And I’m not even beginning to chat about Indira Gandhi imposed Emergency and what it did to independence of any kind. Apple hadn’t fallen much from the tree as her father, India’s initially prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru bought poet Majrooh Sultanpuri arrested for criticism who had to shell out good two yrs in jail.

That’s why, when Congress leaders specific shock at any one ‘stifling freedom of expression’, it is nothing at all shorter of shocking.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading