Connect with us

Entertainment

Chinese smartphone company Gionee caught with malware injected into millions of smartphones

Avatar

Published

on

gionee-found-guilty-for-infecting-malware-over-20-million-phones

Every month we hear of malware being planted on smartphones. In this case, most of the time malware enters the phone through the hands of a third party application. As a result, Google is forced to remove multiple malicious apps from its Play Store. But this time the Chinese smartphone maker Gionee is standing on the fence as it has made it easier for malware to enter the device. According to the report, the smartphone brand has implemented malware on more than 20 million smartphones to gain from unsolicited advertisements and other means. That’s why Gionee has been convicted by China’s Judgment Document Network.

According to a recent report on the portal GizChina, Shenzhen Zhipu Technology Company Limited, a subsidiary of Gionee, has updated its ‘Story Lock Screen’ application from December 2016 to October 2019. It is learned that the company used ‘Dark Horse Platform’ to make 21.85 million devices available to various advertisers without the knowledge of the users.

According to the report, Gionee, or Shenzhen Zipu, has earned an additional Rs 31.48 crore in the mentioned period by allowing these malware ads to enter the brand’s devices. But the end is not saved!

For now, a Chinese court has convicted Shenzhen Zipu of illegally controlling users’ information systems and sentenced three people to imprisonment and fines. Xu Li, Zhu Ying and Jia Zhengqiang were sentenced to three years in prison and Pan Qi to six months in prison. Each was fined 200,000 yuan (about. 22.59 million).


A person who enjoys creating, buying, testing, evaluating and learning about new technology.

Entertainment

Prey: Immigration, Islam and the Erosion of Women’s Legal rights by Ayaan Hirsi Ali assessment

Avatar

Published

on

Prey: Immigration, Islam and the Erosion of Women’s Rights by Ayaan Hirsi Ali review
A

yaan Hirsi Ali is a Somali-born critic of Islam and Islamism.

In 2004, she turned identified internationally soon after Dutch director Theo van Gogh was murdered for a shorter film she had published called Submission on women’s subservient standing in Islam. The Islamist who murdered him, threatened that she would be next.

In 2006, Hirsi Ali co-signed a Manifesto in opposition to Islamism, which pressured that the struggle against this new totalitarianism was ‘not a clash of civilisations’ involving West and East, but a struggle concerning democrats and theocrats the world over.

The rise of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and the ex-Muslim motion in the West, defending the suitable to depart and criticise Islam with no dread, intended that her work was appropriate to a lot of. She left the Netherlands to be a part of a conservative assume tank in the US shortly after a controversy over her Dutch citizenship and has been there at any time because.

The premise of Hirsi Ali’s new guide Prey: Immigration, Islam and the Erosion of Women’s Rights is that there is, in actuality, a clash of civilisations and that the rise in sexual violence in Europe because 2015 is owing to an improve of migrant gentlemen from Muslim-majority nations around the world with sexist attitudes.

She says the British grooming gangs illustrate ‘the persistence of misogynistic attitudes in immigrant Muslim communities.’ She provides that ‘increasing quantities of Pakistani-British males have turn into included in criminal offense considering the fact that the 2000s’ in the United kingdom and that there have been ‘significant will increase [in sexual violence offences] in a number of areas and countries (England, Wales, Denmark, Sweden) right after 2015, which definitely can not be stated away by technicalities.’

Undoubtedly, sexual violence is pervasive and on the rise in the United kingdom, Europe and everywhere. For instance, incidents of rape per 100,000 are increased in Australia and the US than a the greater part of European countries. According to WHO, most sexual violence is carried out by an personal partner, not a stranger. This violence has been enormously exacerbated for the duration of lockdown.

Despite the quantities, violence from ladies is disregarded not simply because of ‘political correctness’ as Hirsi Ali states, but due to the fact it is hardly taken significantly – no make any difference who commits the criminal offense.

Discriminatory rape legislation, weak enforcement, absence of investigations and prosecutions, small reporting of rape thanks to distrust, austerity measures shrinking entry to justice, lenient sentencing, sufferer blaming, and restricted consent-based legislation are some of the reasons that perpetrators – whether they are grooming gangs, wolf-pack rapists or clergymen – do not experience justice.

The prevalent denominator of the sexual violence pandemic is not men from Muslim-greater part international locations but adult men who dedicate sexual violence and the states that fall short, yet again and once more, to hold them to account.

Nonetheless, Hirsi Ali insists there a causal relationship among elevated migration and elevated sexual violence. To clearly show this, she depends on stats she herself admits are ‘fraught with difficulty’ even though also acknowledging that police in most European nations around the world, including the British isles, do not document perpetrator migration standing or faith.

In purchase to clearly show how migrant adult males from Muslim-majority nations around the world are unique from what she phone calls the indigenous-born, she places them in the four groups of: adapters (whom she claims are ‘a minority’), menacing sorts, fanatics, and coasters (people presumably on welfare). For her, a ‘plausible rationalization for the apparent adaption deficit is the mindset of Muslim migrants toward women.’ And by Muslim migrants, she signifies ‘new arrivals trying to get asylum’ and ‘the sons and even grandsons of immigrants.’

But sexism is not in someone’s DNA mainly because of a lottery of start. All those in power decide the dominant tradition and use drive to impose it, consequently why many flee. Also, no group, population or culture are monoliths. Culture is not static. It is regularly shifting and currently being revised, reviewed and challenged by folks with company. In Iran, for case in point, there is a tsunami of atheism and a vibrant women’s liberation movement irrespective of a repressive theocracy.

This is not to say that migrants are collectively very good just as they are not collectively negative. Nor are all beliefs and cultural techniques equal or equally valid. But it is people who dedicate crimes that ought to be prosecuted and held accountable for sexual violence. Regardless of whether they are Muslim, ex-Muslim or Christian. Jewish, Hindu, atheist or Buddhist. Regardless of whether they are citizens or new arrivals. Whether or not they are documented or undocumented. Guilt by association and the putting of collective blame on migrant adult males from Muslim-the greater part countries, on the other hand, are tribalistic with no put in a fashionable justice process.

For a person enamoured with ‘Western civilisation,’ Hirsi Ali ought to fully grasp particular person rather than group accountability for crime. Her emphasis on migrant adult men from Muslim-bulk nations around the world indicates that her alternatives are focused on migration regulate alternatively than ending sexual violence. They incorporate severe punishments for small infractions, improved southern border safety, enlarged defence budgets, expanded surveillance, and further more armed service interventions as properly as the scrapping of the asylum regime and the deportation of people who really don’t subscribe to or adopt western values. Which ‘western values’ is unclear: hers, Douglas Murray’s, Donald Trump’s and Tommy Robinson’s, or that of Martin Luther King, Emmeline Pankhurst and the Tolpuddle Martyrs.

She also endorses that welfare be linked to conduct and that migrants be screened, together with by a psychologist, for their ‘ability to adapt.’ She doesn’t feel worried about what will happen to freedoms of conscience and expression that are the cornerstones of Western – or far more properly, universal – values. Or that linking the ideal to social expert services and asylum to ethically bankrupt ideas of morality are a rehashing of Victorian notions that blame poverty on the lifestyle and character of the so-called undeserving poor.

She finishes her e book as she begins it – with scaremongering: ‘Do we want a Europe in which photographs of woman existence taken before 2015 turn into objects of fascination, like [those] that the central character censors in Atwood’s sequence to the Handmaid’s Tale…?’

Penned during Trump’s presidency, and posted only in the US, Hirsi Ali’s ebook on the Uk and Europe panders to Trumpian and populist politics. It is more anxious with defending the racialisation of crime and the criminalisation of migration than ending sexual violence. Plainly, even if all her options are carried out to the letter, violence from females will still be a pandemic. But that is not, following all, the position of her e book.

Prey: Immigration, Islam and the Erosion of Women’s Legal rights by Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Harper, £20.91)

Maryam Namazie is the Spokesperson of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Regulation for All

Continue Reading

Trending