Connect with us


Rahul Gandhi cites now debunked WSJ report to defame Bajrang Dal




Rahul Gandhi cites already debunked WSJ article to defame Bajrang Dal

On Friday, Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) slammed Congress scion Rahul Gandhi right after he experimented with to defame the organisation citing a report by still left-propagandist media property Wall Avenue Journal (WSJ). The WSJ report experienced claimed that inspite of an inside assessment calling for a ban on the Bajrang Dal, Fb experienced not cracked down on the Hindu nationalist group owing to these good reasons.

“Facebook US says Bajrang Dal content is offensive and should really be banned. Facebook India tells our Parliamentary panel that Bajrang Dal material is not offensive. Is Facebook lying to India and its Parliament?” the former Congress President tweeted whilst sharing the Wall Avenue Journal report.

Screengrab of the tweet by Rahul Gandhi

VHP slams Rahul Gandhi, thoughts his anti-India stance

In a assertion on Friday, VHP Spokesperson Vinod Bansal claimed that Rahul Gandhi has uncovered his attitude by citing wrong accusations, designed by Wall Street Journal. VHP Secretary Common Shri Milind Parande stated that Rahul Gandhi has been proactive in his help of anti-national components, Tukde Tukde gang, anti-CAA hooligans, professional-China and professional-Pakistan components.

VHP reiterated that nationalist organisations such as Bajrang Dal have for that reason develop into the eyesore of Rahul Gandhi. “His affiliation and rapport with China are nicely recognised. He would imagine in an American newspaper but, not in a Pan-Bharat nationalist youth corporation!” the organisation mentioned.

VHP Secretary-Typical Milind Parande has demanded an apology from the Wall Street Journal for its bogus reporting, targetting and discrediting India less than the pretext of defaming Bajrang Dal. Highlighting media reviews and Wiki-Leaks, he explained that Congress President Sonia Gandhi had also tried out to ban Bajrang Dal but unsuccessful.

“Incidentally, Facebook has clarified that there is no reason to block Bajrang Dal on Facebook. This reflects their hostile anti-Hindu mindset. Sri Parande stated that now Rahul Gandhi and the Wall Street Journal must apologize to the Bajrang Dal and the Hindu culture that forms 1/6th of the global populace,” VHP emphasised.

Claims of the Wall Street Journal on Bajrang Dal debunked by Fb

Facebook India Head Ajit Mohan explained to a parliamentary panel on Wednesday that the social media giant experienced identified no cause to act towards the Hindu-nationalist organisation Bajrang Dal immediately after studies experienced emerged claiming Facebook did not scrutinize accounts belonging to the Hindu organisation.

According to the reports, Ajit Mohan was summoned by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Engineering on Wednesday chaired by Congress leader Shashi Tharoor to focus on the security of person facts. Responding to the allegations by the WSJ, Facebook officers mentioned ahead of the panel members that Facebook’s truth-checking group had not, so significantly, found any content material, between content posted by the Bajrang Dal, that violated its social media insurance policies.

Fb India chief Ajit Mohan has also rejected the WSJ report expressing it was “factually erroneous and untrue”. The Facebook team led by Mohan informed the parliamentary panel that people today quoted in the WSJ report “had no know-how or authority, and ended up not in the hierarchical chain” to remark on the decision creating method.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading