Connect with us


Here is why Pratap Sarnaik is threatening Kirit Somaiya with a Rs 100 cr defamation go well with



Here is why Pratap Sarnaik is threatening Kirit Somaiya with a Rs 100 cr defamation suit

A war of words and phrases has ensued concerning BJP chief Kirit Somaiya and embattled Shiv Sena legislator Pratap Sarnaik soon after the former alleged irregularities in the housing assignments carried out by the Sena MLA’s Vihang Team. It is pertinent to be aware that Pratap Sarnaik is latest beneath ED investigation and only a few days ago, Pakistani credit history playing cards were being found in his possession.

On Friday, Sarnaik sent a discover to Somaiya, inquiring him to prove the allegations levelled by him or publicly apologise to him in the up coming 15 times, failing which Sarnaik will file a Rs 100 crores defamation fit from the previous MP. The detect further added the allegations designed by Somaiya had been ‘infantile’ and have been made with the convey function of reviving his political vocation. 

Somaiya alleges cheating, Sarnaik refutes allegations

Somaiya on Wednesday convened a press conference in which he accused Sarnaik of cheating middle-course home buyers, alleging that the constructing produced in Thane by Sarnaik’s Vihang group does not have permissions to improve its flooring from 9 to 13 and that the Thane Municipal Corporation has presented orders to demolish the framework. He also added that the design at Thane’s Vihang Backyard garden by Sarnaik’s Group is illegal. 

“TMC Declared The two Buildings illegal. In 2012, Thane Municipal Corporation requested the demolition of 9 to 13 flooring. Nonetheless, no motion has been taken till now. OC is not obtained till day,” he added. 

Sarnaik experienced then rubbished the allegations, accusing the BJP leader of dredging up aged troubles that were being already resolved with the municipal company. 

“Kirit Somaiya is seeking to tarnish my reputation using a 10-calendar year-previous problem. While the get the job done of the OC has been delayed, the FSI has not been violated in the venture. We had defined that we have manufactured a civic faculty in trade of the transferable progress legal rights (TDR). The notice was then taken again,” mentioned Sarnaik, introducing Somaiya will have to either apologise or deal with a defamation suit. 

On the other hand, unfazed by Sarnaik’s danger of slapping a Rs 100 crore defamation lawsuit, Somaiya stated, “I will welcome Pratap Sarnaik’s see of defamation.”

Two months again, Somaiya experienced questioned why Sarnaik and spouse and children were jogging absent from the ED investigation of Rs 175 Crore similar to MMRDA and Top rated Securities Fraud. 

Pratap Sarnaik moves privilege motion against media outlets for reporting restoration of Pakistani credit score card from his home

In the meantime, Sarnaik has also despatched a letter to the condition legislature secretariat in search of admission of his breach of privilege observe from print and digital media stores for defaming him by publishing stories dependent on a tweet of actor Kangana Ranaut. The letter was in response to information experiences of a Pakistani credit score card staying recovered by the ED from Sarnaik’s home. 

Previously past 7 days, information reports claimed that a credit score card registered underneath the title of a Pakistani national is recovered from the premises of the Shiv Sena legislator Pratap Sarnaik. It was also reported that the Pakistani credit rating card was registered on the deal with of the Shiv Sena MLA.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news



Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading