Connect with us


Congress MP Jasbir Dimpa manhandles a girl journalist in Delhi




Congress MP Jasbir Dimpa manhandles a woman journalist in Delhi

Amidst ongoing farmer protests in opposition to Agriculture Regulations in and about Delhi, quite a few leaders are seeking to acquire political advantage of the circumstance. Some Congress leaders are at this time lodged at Jantar Mantar in Delhi to assist the farmers’ protests. A person these leader, Congress MP Jasbir Dimpa, was caught on digicam although manhandling a female journalist Chandanpreet Kaur of Raonuk Punjab Dee Television (RPD 24).

In the video uploaded by RPD 24, it was noticeable that a slightly hard issue irked the legislator, who then tried out to snatch the digital camera from the cameraman and manhandled the feminine journalist. Kaur, who narrated the ordeal in the direction of the 2nd 50 percent of the online video, mentioned that Dimpa’s workforce did not let them to go away the site without the need of receiving obtain to the recorded movie.

What particularly took place at Jantar Mantar?

On December 22, RPD 24 reporter Chandanpreet Kaur went to Jantar Mantar to job interview Congress leader Ravneet Bittu, MP from Ludhiana. When she achieved the locale, Bittu was not obtainable. Kaur reported that she asked MP Jasbir Dimpa about Bittu’s whereabouts, to which he replied that she must communicate to him first.

Kaur asked Dimpa a easy concern that could have been answered easily. She asked him that the farmers say that they have no have confidence in still left in any political occasion and all people is just executing vote politics. In accordance to Dimpa, who is liable for such distrust amid farmers, she asked. For some motive, Dimpa obtained irked by the query and requested Kaur to query these who are dependable for the distrust and not him. Apparently Kaur did not even allege that Dimpa is any where accountable for the distrust.

Some miscommunication between the reporter and the MP led to a heated argument concerning them. It bought out of hand when Dimpa requested her to lessen her volume, to which she countered to use decent language although chatting to her. Dimpa acquired so offended that he acquired up and snatched the camera from the cameraman. All through the incident, a girl supposedly from Dimpa’s workforce was read contacting the cops. Following a couple seconds, the digicam was slice-off while Dimpa was hoping to delete the movie.

Kaur has alleged that Dimpa’s group took absent the memory card of the camera that had the online video and other belongings. She claimed, “His [Dimpa] crew forgot that we are residing in 2020 and we might have two cards in the digicam.” The cameraman was sensible adequate to handover a single card and saved yet another that had the online video with him to display the planet the real colours of Congress leaders.

Curiously, both of those Dimpa and Chandanpreet Kaur had been cursing the BJP-led central governing administration and abused mainstream media by contacting them ‘sold-out’ and ‘godi-media’ but ended up possessing a heated argument by themselves.

MP Dimpa really should apologize, claims Digital Media Association

Digital Media Affiliation took cognizance of the incident and demanded that MP Dimpa apologizes for his conduct quickly. President of the association Narendra Nandan stated that the association would not tolerate this kind of conduct towards the media. He even further included that if Dimpa does not apologize, the affiliation would file a grievance at Chief Minister Amrinder Singh’s workplace.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading