Connect with us


Rahul Gandhi tweeted a poem to exploit farmers difficulty, kin of poet demands apology




Rahul Gandhi tweeted a poem to exploit farmers issue, kin of poet demands apology

A working day soon after Congress scion Rahul Gandhi distorted the 7-decade-aged legendary poem ‘Veer Tum Badhe Chalo’, published by Dwarika Prasad Maheshwari, for furthering his political agenda amidst the ongoing farmer protests, the kin of the poet has demanded an apology from him.

In his tweet on Sunday, Rahul Gandhi experienced transformed a few traces of the poem to go well with the existing political narrative bordering the historic farm legal guidelines. “Be it drinking water guns or a thousand jackals, farmers need to go in advance (with the motion),” he distorted the poem.

Screengrab of the tweet by Rahul Gandhi with the distorted poem, by means of Twitter

As for each reviews, the household members of the celebrated poet criticised Rahul Gandhi for mocking the legitimate spirit of the poem and demanded an apology. This included Dr Vinod Kumar Maheshwari, son of Dwarka Prasad Maheshwari and previous principal of Agra Higher education. He stated that a era of Indian citizens have been encouraged by his father’s poem. “The distortion is an injustice to the soul of the late poet,” Dr Vinod reported. He extra, “Rahul Gandhi has made exciting of these kinds of an iconic poem. It is very condemnable and you will have to apologise for this.”

At the very same time, Dr Pranjal Maheshwari, the grandson of Dwarka Prasad Maheshwari, also criticised Rahul Gandhi’s act and corrected him. He said, “It is superior time that you study the poem by coronary heart. The lines you have additional are not proper.”

The family customers of the poet have said that by sharing the distorted edition to additional his political objectives, Rahul Gandhi has mocked and insulted the spirit of the poem.


Munawar Faruqui defended by Congress MP Vivek Tankha in Court




Vivek Tankha is the Chairman of AICC's legal department

Self-proclaimed comic Munawar Faruqui was represented at the Madhya Pradesh High Court docket during the listening to on his bail application by senior advocate Vivek Tankha. The comedian was arrested by the MP Police for creating derogatory remarks from Hindu Gods and hurting spiritual sentiments.

As it so comes about, Vivek Tankha is an elected agent to the Upper Household of the Parliament from the Congress bash. Vivek Tanka was elected to the Rajya Sabha on a Congress ticket in 2016. The previous 12 months, in 2015, he claimed that he will go the Supreme Court in relationship with the Vyapam Rip-off.

Vivek Tankha is also the Chairman of the All India Congress Committee’s “Legal Human Legal rights and RTI Department”.

Vivek Tankha is the Chairman of AICC’s legal department

Vivek Tankha experienced also appeared on behalf of farmers at the Supreme Court and welcomed the final decision of the Court to keep the not too long ago passed farm regulations.

Vivek Tankha appeared on behalf of farmers at the Supreme Court
Vivek Tankha appeared on behalf of Madhyafarmers at the Supreme Court docket

Madhya Pradesh High Court docket reserves order

Reserving the purchase on the bail application submitted by Munawar Faruqui, the judge asked, “But why you consider undue edge of other’s religious sentiments and emotions. What is wrong with your frame of mind? How can you do this for the function of your business?” Senior Advocate Vivek Tankha argued on behalf of Munawar Faruqui, “He has dedicated no offence in the subject your lordships. Bail really should be granted”.

Justice Rohit Arya mentioned, “Such men and women must not be spared. I will reserve the purchase on deserves.”

The Munawar Faruqui controversy

Faruqui and four other folks discovered as Edwin Anthony, Prakhar Vyas, Priyam Vyas and Nalin Yadav were arrested for allegedly mocking Hindu Gods in a stand-up comedy display in Indore primarily based on the complaint of Eklavya Singh Gaur, an activist and the main of Hindu Rakshak Sangathan.

They ended up booked less than IPC sections 295-A (outraging religious feelings), 269 (unlawful or negligent act most likely to spread the infection of any disease hazardous to lifetime) and other appropriate provisions. Portion 269 was invoked for allegedly disregarding COVID-19 safety protocol. Faruqui was sent to judicial custody until January 13 which was later extended to January 27. Earlier, his bail application was adjourned to this 7 days.

Continue Reading