Connect with us


WB authorities paid out salaries of Saradha Team Television channel from CM’s reduction fund: CBI




WB government paid salaries of Saradha Group TV channel from CM's relief fund: CBI

West Bengal Assembly elections are scheduled for subsequent 12 months, and the current growth in Saradha Fraud is heading to intensify the political heat in the state. In a contempt plea in Saradha Chit Fund Scam, the Central Bureau of Investigation has mentioned in the Supreme Court that the money from Chief Minister Reduction Fund of West Bengal had been applied purportedly for the salaries of staff of Tara Tv that is under investigation in the situation.

Tara Television set is a part of the Saradha Team of Organizations. CBI has explained that the CM Aid Fund compensated Rs.27 lakh for every month for 23 months from May perhaps 2013 to April 2015 in direction of the salaries of Tara Tv workers.

In its application, the CBI mentioned, “It is submitted that the explained amounts had been purportedly presented toward income payments of the workforce of the said media company that was below investigation currently being portion of Saradha Group of Companies.” The complete total clocks to Rs.6.21 crore that was paid out employing CM Reduction Fund to pay back Tara Television set Employees Welfare Affiliation.

CBI has also reportedly mentioned in its application that they experienced prepared to the chief secretary, West Bengal, on October 16, 2018, to offer facts about the structure and operating of the Main Minister’s Relief Fund so that the company can look into the suspicious payments further. However, they only bought incomplete or evasive info from the condition federal government.

Higher Court get did not talk to to pay back salaried from CM fund

CBI, even though citing the Higher Courtroom get when the court docket questioned to pay out the wage of the staff members from the accessible funds, mentioned that that buy did not say that the salaries of the personnel of a private Tv channel can be paid applying the state funds that were being collected in the title of reduction get the job done. It claimed, “The Courtroom get expressly states that the employees are to be compensated out of the resources of the business. The payments from CM Reduction Fund, ex-facie level towards a larger sized conspiracy and nexus.”

Mamata Banerjee Named in the software

The CBI charm has hinted at the involvement of the Mamata Banerjee administration. It reported, “Communication amongst the CBI and condition authorities will demonstrate that there has been a concerted energy to evade, avoid and to escape the system of law and a mindful work on part of the authorities to scuttle the investigation.”

CBI also noted that when Enforcement Directorate questioned previous Rajya Sabha MP Kunal Kumar Ghosh in Oct 2013, it was disclosed that CM Banerjee and Saradha Group promoter Sudipta Sen experienced incredibly very good associations.

Ghosh is also 1 of the accused in the scenario. CBI mentioned, “It is submitted that the similar establishes that the Chief Minister utilised to speak to Sudipta Sen working with the telephone of Kunal Kumar Ghosh,” stated the application. For the duration of the investigation, when CBI checked the phone aspects of two figures of Sen for one year, the company found that he and Ghosh talked 298 times on one variety and nine moments on the second range, as per a report by Business enterprise Conventional.

Function of former Kolkata Law enforcement Commissioner Rajiv Kumar

The CBI also sought custodial interrogation of previous Kolkata Law enforcement Commissioner Rajiv Kumar and mentioned that Bidhannagar police experienced concealed proof relevant to the connection concerning the ruling social gathering of the state and Saradha Group of Corporations on the behest of Kumar. CBI alleged that the stage was taken to preserve all people in the scenario.

When ED questioned Ghosh as a witness in October 2013, it was revealed that Kumar was in speak to with ED during the arrests of Sudipta Sen, Debjani Mukherjee, or witnesses Ghosh and many others all through September to November 2013. CBI said, “It was ensured by the officers that grave specifics narrated by these accused persons or witnesses should not be taken on report as portion of the investigation with a intent to shield the influential folks.”

In the course of the investigation, the agency reportedly located far more evidence that proved Kumar was actively associated in shielding and shielding the influential co-accused in the circumstance who had illegally collected funds using illegal business activities of the group of Ponzi providers.

Saradha chit fund rip-off

The Saradha rip-off broke out into the open in 2013 when a Ponzi plan operate by the Saradha Group, a consortium of in excess of 200 personal providers, collapsed following accumulating hundreds and thousands of crores from more than 15 lakh investors.

Rajiv Kumar was component of the Special Investigation Group established up by the West Bengal governing administration to probe the fraud. In 2014, the Supreme Courtroom handed above the investigation to CBI. In November 2019, the Supreme Court docket had sought a reaction from the IPS officer on the CBI’s attraction against Calcutta High Court’s order to grant anticipatory bail to Kumar. It is notable here that when CBI officers experienced gone to interrogate Rajiv Kumar in the circumstance, CM Mamata Banerjee experienced sat in a dharna for days. She experienced called the interrogation a ‘political vendetta’.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading