Connect with us


Mumbai law enforcement drops charges from female who held “Absolutely free Kashmir” placard




Mumbai police drops charges against woman who held "Free Kashmir" placard

The Mumbai police on Tuesday dropped charges in opposition to ‘protestor’ Mehak Mirza Prabhu who was noticed with a ‘Free Kashmir’ poster at the anti-CAA protests in Mumbai in solidarity with anti-CAA protestors of Delhi.

In the ‘C Summary’ report filed by the Mumbai police in the case registered versus Mahek Mirza Prabhu, the police have reportedly reported that they identified “no malicious motive” in the grievance.

It really should be observed that law enforcement data files a ‘C Summary’ report when the situation is neither real nor false or when the felony situation was submitted thanks to miscalculation of facts or the offence complained about is of a civil character.

“Free Kashmir” poster at the anti-CAA protest

For the unversed, Mehak Mirza Prabhu, who identifies herself as a ‘storyteller’, had appeared at the anti-CAA protest held at the Gateway of India in January this year with a “free Kashmir” poster.

The existence of “free Kashmir” poster at the protest led a lot of to suspect that it is not merely a students’ protest towards the JNU violence, but there were being anti-national forces concerned. As it had turned out, the DGISPR of Pakistan, Asif Ghafoor, experienced cited a report about the placard to declare that it was the ‘beginning of the end’ for India. In his tweet, he also claimed that Kashmir is Pakistan.

In response to the outrage and the detrimental messages that have been put out towards Prabhu for pushing anti-India agenda, Mumbai police had on January 7 submitted an FIR versus her beneath Section 153 (B) of the Indian Penal Code for “imputation, assertions prejudicial to the nationwide interest”.

Maha Aghadi Govt in Maharashtra hurry to protect the girl who held ‘free Kashmir’ placard throughout anti-CAA protest

Apparently, shortly just after the FIR was registered, the Maha Aghadi govt in Maharashtra had rushed to defend the lady. Whilst Maharashtra Household Minister and NCP chief Anil Deshmukh experienced stated that prima facie keeping “Free Kashmir” poster did not seem like the accused experienced any “anti-nationwide intentions” and experienced reported that he would review the FIR against the accused, Shiv Sena’s firebrand Sanjay Raut has said that ‘free Kashmir’ posters did not suggest truly ‘free Kashmir’ and they desired only flexibility from constraints of online expert services, cell companies and other difficulties.

Maharashtra government’s new tourism and atmosphere minister Aaditya Thackeray had dismissed the ‘Free Kashmir’ placard at the protests and mentioned that we have to have to “look at the much larger picture”.

What’s more, the Shiv Sena, in its mouthpiece Saamana had also backed the accused despite the secessionist placard. “Mumbaikar Marathi woman lamented the plight of folks of Kashmir in a peaceful fashion. On the other hand, the Opposition is terming it as an act of treason. There can be no even worse illustration by the Opposition functions,” wrote Shiv Sena.

After pushing her anti-India agenda, girl difficulties apology

Adhering to the outrage, Mehak Mirza Prabhu, had issued an apology expressing that the “Placard meant independence to express by themselves, liberty from the web lockdown which a lot of folks have been complaining about. I was voicing my solidarity for the basic constitutional right”.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading