Connect with us


Mumbai: Ex-Military officer threatened and assaulted by Shiv Sena goons




Mumbai: Ex-Army officer threatened and assaulted by Shiv Sena goons

The controversy above the incident where by a veteran of the Indian Navy was attacked by Shiv Sena goons in September this yr had not however died down that one more related incident has arrive to the fore from Maharashtra. A criticism has been submitted by an ax-Army officer in Mumbai’s Wadala location, accusing an influential Shiv Sena corporator of threatening him with lifetime and conspiring to commit aggravated assault on him. He has also alleged inaction by Mumbai law enforcement authorities.

The ex-military officer named Sujit Apte has submitted a writ petition in the Bombay High Court docket just after the Mumbai law enforcement refused to file an FIR from the Shiv Sena corporator Amey Ghole. The distraught ex-Military officer, talking to OpIndia, reveals how he was compelled to knock the doorways of the Bombay High court docket after Mumbai law enforcement remained nonchalant and unsympathetic to the transgressions fully commited in the direction of him by potent and weighty politicians and their goons.

Sujit Apte mentions in his writ petition submitted in the Bombay HC that Mumbai police, pressurized by area politicians, have failed to acquire proper action in his case and he feels his and his family members life is less than menace. He has thus sought the Bombay HC’s intervention in the scenario.

The Writ Petition submitted by Sujit Apte in Bombay HC

For the unversed, Amey Ghole is an influential Shiv Sena member and a near support of Maharashtra CM’s son and the condition Tourism and Atmosphere minister Aaditya Thackeray. He also retains critical posts like that of the treasurer of the Yuva Sena and the wellbeing committee main of Brihanmumbai Municipal Company (BMC).

Divulging the information of the circumstance, the former army officer Sujit Apte informed OpIndia that the full difficulty revolved all around an unlawful Sai Baba Mandir structure created on the footpath abutting his property.

As told by Apte, the challenge begun following the unlawful building was demolished by the Municipal authorities. The demolished temple was close to a slum place and was utilised for all kinds of illicit actions by the anti-social factors of the vicinity backed by the neighborhood effective men and women who claimed to be leaders. They use to sit inside the unlawful premises and freely eat liquor and smoke medications, without having fearing any action from authorities.

It is pertinent to take note right here that complying with 2017 Bombay HC selection, which purchased that any illegal construction manufactured on the footpath wanted to be razed, the Sai Baba Mandir construction in Wadala was demolished at the time formerly, but localities with the help of the municipal corporation had re-erected the temple.

Just before the state went into lockdown to check out the spread of coronavirus, BMC experienced as soon as yet again issued a demolition discover to the temple belief. Having said that, since of the lockdown, the demolition method was stalled. Throughout the lockdown, the temple grew to become a hub for all types of illicit pursuits. The locals from the close by slum utilized to sit there and consume alcoholic beverages and smoke medications, Apte educated. Owing to all this, Apte along with other regional citizens submitted a PIL and based on it, the court docket-ordered BMC to promptly seal the temple premises until finally the lockdown was in place and at the time the lockdown was lifted BMC was instructed to immediately demolish the framework.

Considering the fact that BMC did not comply with the courtroom orders to seal the house, yet another resident submitted a contempt petition from the civic human body. The contempt plea was heard by the Main Justice of Bombay HC who purchased BMC to instantly demolish the unlawful composition and submit a report regarding the very same to the court by December 15. Dependent on the HC order’s the Municipal company demolished the composition on December 11, 2020.

Immediately after the composition was demolished, the Shiv Sena corporator Amey Ghole arrived to Sujit Apte’s residence on December 13, 2020. He was accompanied by another junior engineer, named Gulekar and other nearby goons. Holding Apte responsible for the demolition of the structure, the Shiv Sena goons threatened him with existence. Ghole rebuked Apte by indicating: “Aapke vajah see humara mandir toota hain, yeh mandir humare voters ka mandir tha. Woh usse kisi bhi kaam ke liye istamaal karen tum kaun hote ho kuch bolne wale”, around translated as “It is due to the fact of you that our temple has been demolished. That temple belonged to our voters. They could have used it to do no matter what they wished to. Who are you to interfere”.

Ghole continued to threaten Apte by indicating: “now my voters would sit on the footpath abutting your house and do charas and ganja or no matter what they want”. Ghole purchased Apte to remove all the stability set up on his home latest by December 16, as they would start out the re-erection of the Sai Baba Temple from that day. The Shiv Sena corporator more threatened Apte of dire implications if he tried out to impede the re-erection perform.

‘Dekhe kaun rokta hain humme’, bragged the Shiv Sena corporator

Apte listed here wonders how on a Sunday, the Shiv Sena corporator managed to get BMC officials to accompany him. “Sunday ko kausa BMC offical kaam karta hain” (which BMC formal operates on a Sunday, puzzled Apte.

Right after threatening the ex-Military officer, Shiv Sena leader purposely questioned all his goons who had accompanied him to Apte’s residence to sit there and drink, smoke or do no matter what they wished to do. “Dekhe kaun rokta hain humme” (Let us see who can prevent us), cried out Amey Ghole.

Meanwhile, Sujit Apte’s councillor Dhrutiman Joshi explained to OpIndia that at the time the Shiv Sena goons still left, the former Military officer approached the area law enforcement station with a grievance against the Shiv Sena corporator and his goons. He described in the law enforcement criticism that Amey Ghole had threatened him with lifestyle. Sujit Apte also submitted CCTV footage as proof to validate his promises. Even so, his criticism went unheard.

Thereafter on the intervening evening of December 17 and 18, a single of the goons who had accompanied the Shiv Sena corporator to Apte’s dwelling on December 13, trespassed Apte’s home. The masked goon was carrying an iron rod with him. He threatened Apte’s safety guard and broke all the CCTV cameras in the sophisticated. The goon was about to crack into Apte’s house when law enforcement achieved the location and he fled.

Mumbai police refuses to file and FIR in opposition to the Shiv Sena corporator

Sujit Apte rushed to the Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Marg law enforcement station to lodge a grievance in opposition to Amey Ghole and his goons, but the officer in cost refused to file an FIR towards Ghole. The officer informed Apte that because he was not harmed bodily, an FIR can’t be filed in the case. Instead, the officer registered an NC on the identify of Apte’s security guard who was threatened by the goon.

The Writ petition filed by Sujit Apte in Bombay HC

For the unversed, an NC complaint is taken for non cognizable cases. In these conditions the police officer might receive a grievance and sign up it, but are not able to examine without having a magistrate’s purchase, or make arrests devoid of a warrant. He cannot even file an FIR with no judicial authorization. These types of offenses are typically tiny in magnitude, involving community nuisance, mischief, slight fraud and so forth.

Apte uncovered that he stored likely back to the PS and insisted on them registering an FIR versus the Shiv Sena corporator who he mentioned was the mastermind behind the complete transgression. Apte revealed that also he submitted CCTV footage as proof of how Ghole experienced led the full conspiracy from him but police, underneath the pressure of nearby politicians unsuccessful to acquire any motion in opposition to Ghole.

Duplicate of Sujit Apte’s letter to RAK PS
Duplicate of Sujit Apte’s letter to RAK PS

Persistent on receiving Ghole to spend for his wrongdoings, Apte wrote to senior officers. Eventually on December 20, 2020, police did sign up an FIR but not against Amey Ghole but some Jagdish Shinde, who was also granted bail minutes after the FIR was registered, exposed Dhrutiman Joshi to OpIndia.

The Writ petition submitted by Sujit Apte in Bombay HC

Authorities discouraged the previous military officer to increase voice in opposition to Amey Ghole

In the writ petition submitted to Bombay HC, the petitioner- Sujit Apte wrote that when he approached the joint municipal commissioner- Narendra Ramkrishna Barde to examine the issue, the latter asked for him not to indulge with Amey Ghole. The joint municipal commissioner made Apte listen to audio get in touch with recording where Ghole was listened to openly threatening Apte in the presence of the commissioner.

It is critical to be aware in this article that in the writ petition Respondent No.8 refers to joint municipal commissioner- Narendra Ramkrishna Barde and Respondent No.5 is Amey Ghole, the Shiv Sena corporator.

The Writ petition filed by Sujit Apte in Bombay HC

Ghole is really influential and has a stronghold above community authorities in his jurisdiction as he was not only a nearby corporator of the ruling celebration in the Municipal but also a top lover in the Maharashtra alliance governing administration. This was likely why he did not panic the law and had no respect for the identical, opined Apte.

In these conditions, Sujit Apte was remaining with no alternative but to solution the Bombay High Courtroom by way of a writ petition beneath Posting 226 of the constitution of India via which the petitioner has urged the court docket to direct the law enforcement to register an FIR in opposition to the Shiv Sena corporator Amey Ghole, the junior engineer Ghulekar and Wagmare under IPC sections 120(B), 34, 425, 426, 441, 442, 445, 446, 447, 448, 450, 451, 452, 455, 456, 457, 458, 504, 506 and section 110 and 117 of Bombay Law enforcement Act.

The Writ petition submitted by Sujit Apte in Bombay HC

Next, Apte requested that a district committee is constituted to hear the grievances of ex-servicemen and below whose supervision these circumstances can be investigated.

The Bombay HC is scheduled to listen to the scenario on January 13, 2021.

Maha government harassing citizens for their viewpoints and social media criticism

This is only a single of the numerous cases wherever Shiv Sena goons have misused their party’s power and place to sick-handle frequent citizens in the point out. Earlier, it was described how a Navy veteran was brutally attacked by Shiv Sena goons for a satirical WhatsApp ahead mocking Uddhav Thackeray, Sharad Pawar and Sonia Gandhi. CCTV footage of the incident experienced surfaced where the veteran could be seen currently being attacked by a bunch of goons. In December 2019, Sena goons had assaulted and shaved the head of a Wadala resident for criticising Uddhav Thackeray.

Not long ago, the Shiv Sena-managed BMC had ordered the demolition of Kangana Ranaut’s workplace in Mumbai right after her new spat with the governing administration in the point out. Social media users like Sameet Thakkar and Sunaina Holey have also been harassed by the Maharashtra federal government.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading