Connect with us


Analyzing ‘hacked’ protection by Salman Nizami following vile rape tweets




Salman Nizami claims his account was hacked

Congress chief Salman Nizami had manufactured some vile and disgusting tweets basically a thirty day period immediately after the Nirbhaya rape and murder case. In the January 2013 tweets, Salman Nizami reported that ‘only interesting women of all ages are raped’, ‘women provoke sexual harassment’ and that women are ‘asking for trouble’ when they dress ‘provocatively’ amongst other factors. Individuals tweets have now absent viral.

In his first defense, Salman Nizami made a strange comment. He claimed that he was a journalist in 2013. It isn’t clear how that tends to make any big difference. He arrogantly berated people today on social media, “Now sit down!” The natural way, when people refused to do so, he came with a different line of defense.

Salman Nizami claims his account was hacked

He now claims that his account was hacked by Pakistani hackers. He said, “BJP IT mobile attacking me for tweets of 2013 which I in no way wrote & they circulate from time to time when dejection can take them in excess of. Aged ailment of the BJP. Shameful!” But there are a couple of complications with the line of protection he has picked.

1st and foremost, there are many grammatical and spelling errors in the newspaper clip shared by the Congress leader. Pioneer is spelled as ‘Pionner’, ‘some friends’ is penned as ‘some friend’s’ and the date Feb 5 appears to be particularly odd as effectively.

The news clip shared by Salman Nizami has numerous errors
The information clip shared by Salman Nizami has various faults

Additionally, it does not say which newspaper carried the headline. On the full, it appears to be like exceptionally doubtful and is a entire volte-deal with from the 1st line of defense taken by Salman Nizami, which was that he was a journalist back again then.

We delved into the net for additional facts with regards to the make a difference and observed that it is not the 1st time that Salman Nizami had produced this sort of claims. In 2017, prior to the Gujarat Assembly Elections, Key Minister Modi experienced qualified the Congress social gathering above derogatory opinions manufactured by the Congress chief.

Salman Nizami experienced then claimed, “I experienced submitted a law enforcement criticism in 2015 when my phony Twitter account was developed. 5 to 6 accounts in my name were being designed. I have in no way employed this sort of phrases.” “How can the Key Minister estimate from a bogus Twitter account? Any person may well have hacked my account, who is aware,” he experienced claimed.

The reviews have been produced from his verified account on Twitter, so it could not have been a fake account. What’s more, his remarks from back then shows that he believed anyone ‘may have hacked’ his account. Also, the repulsive tweets on rape he created in the aftermath of the Nirbhaya rape and murder have been from January 2013, that is two many years prior to the law enforcement complaint he statements to have submitted above faux accounts.

DNA noted in December 2017 that the derogatory tweets produced by Salman Nizami went as considerably back as 2011, that is 4 many years in advance of he claims to have filed a law enforcement grievance. In a 2013 tweet, he experienced created, “Rahul Gandhi overheard whispering for the duration of the Republic Working day parade: Mummy, if the full military is right here, who is guarding the border correct now?”

He had advised DNA back again then, “Back in 2013 after I experienced published an posting in a nationwide day by day in opposition to terrorists, a number of accounts experienced been created in my title and I was defamed by them. Again in 2015 this sort of points happened and I had lodged a police complain.” Again, this is not a case of hacking that he is alleging.

Pretend accounts currently being developed in one’s name is not the similar as his account currently being hacked. In addition, as we have pointed out previously, the rape tweets could not have been from a faux account as they ended up made from his confirmed manage. For that reason, his hacking promises look dubious until some stable proof is developed.

Also, it is unclear why he did not get rid of the tweets after he regained entry to his Twitter account if his account was in fact ‘hacked’. This January, it will be 8 yrs because the tweets had been designed. It is unclear why he is deleting them only now.


Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, many others go SC immediately after multiple FIRs about phony news




Shashi Tharoor, Rajdeep Sardesai, others move SC after multiple FIRs over fake news

Days after several First Details Stories (FIRs) were filed versus Congress chief Shashi Tharoor, ‘journalist’ Rajdeep Sardesai and many others for spreading bogus news through the Republic Day riots, they have now approached the Supreme Courtroom searching for aid in the scenario.

As for each studies, they were being booked for spreading the pretend information that a person protestor was shot useless by Delhi Police all through the tractor rally on Republic Working day. Even so, in actuality, the victim had died right after his tractor overturned in an incident. Rajdeep Sardesai had tweeted the bogus news on Twitter, and later experienced recurring the same on India Now, declaring that bullet injury was observed on the head of the deceased. Shashi Tharoor experienced also circulated the phony news, which experienced instigated the protestors to indulge in violence.

In addition to Tharoor and Sardesai, instances ended up lodged towards Congress mouthpiece Countrywide Herald’s Senior consulting editor Mrinal Pandey, Quami Awaz editor Zafar Agha, Caravan magazine’s editor and founder Paresh Nath, Caravan editor Anant Nath and its executive editor Vinod K Jose, and one particular unnamed particular person. Quite a few fees were being pressed towards them below Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 120B (felony conspiracy), 153 (provocation to lead to riot), 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 505-1b (intent to result in fear to the public).

Various FIRs in opposition to Rajdeep Sardesai, Shashi Tharoor in UP, Delhi, MP

On Saturday, the Delhi Police submitted a circumstance against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and 6 some others in link to the violence on the occasion of India’s 71st Republic Working day. As for each reviews, the To start with Info Report (FIR) was lodged at the IP Estate police station. Whilst talking about the situation, DCP (Central Delhi) Jasmeet Singh explained that the FIR was registered for developing disharmony and spreading false information on Republic Working day about a farmer dying thanks to law enforcement firing.

The Madhya Pradesh Police, also, had filed an FIR towards Tharoor and 6 some others for fake information on the demise of the rioter who died immediately after his tractor turned turtle. UP Police has also lodged a related FIR from the accused under sections 153(A), 153(B), 295(A), 298, 506, 505(2), 124(A)/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, and less than portion 66 of the Details Engineering act.

Continue Reading