Connect with us


PNB account holders should do this work by 31 March, otherwise they will not be able to use…



PNB account holders should do this work by March 31, otherwise they will not be able to use…

new Delhi. The country’s second largest government bank PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK (PNB) has appealed to its consumers to take the new IFSC (Indian Financial System Code) and checkbook (CHEQUE BOOK) by 31 March. Otherwise they will not be able to avail banking from April 1.

In fact, on 1 April 2020, many banks of the country merged. In which the merger of ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE (OBC) and UNITED BANK OF INDIA took place in PUNJAB BANK OF INDIA. There have been many changes in the banking system since then. Because of this, PNB has asked customers of both these banks to get a new IFSC / MICR and CHEQUE BOOK.

PNB account holders should do this work by March 31, otherwise they will not be able to use…

According to the bank, if you do not do this by 31 March 2021, then you will be away from the use of banking system and transactions. That is, these codes will not work after 31 March 2021. If you want to transfer money, then you have to get a new code from the bank.

Information provided through social media

Punjab National Bank has given this information through social media. The bank has said that the old checkbook and IFSC / MICR code of Oriental Bank of Corse and United Bank of India will work only till 31 March. After this, you have to get a new code and checkbook from the bank. Customers can also call the toll free number 18001802222/18001032222 for more information.

There will be a change in the rules for withdrawing money from ATM from February 1

From February 1, Punjab National Bank customers will not be able to withdraw money from non-EMV ATM machines. The PNB has taken this step in view of increasing cases of fraud. Non-EMV ATMs or non-EVM ATMs are those in which an ATM or debit card is not used during the transaction, all you have to do is swap a card once in the beginning. In these machines, the card is read through the magnetic strip. Whereas in EMV machine, the card is also locked for a few seconds.

Join us on social media platforms to get news updates: Facebook | WhatsApp | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram | Google news


British Steel pension scandal adviser banned from getting a director for 13 a long time



Bosses of Gallium, linked to the British Steel pensions and Basset & Gold scandals, made £1.6m

arren Reynolds, manager of Energetic Wealth, the economic guidance agency famed for its involvement in the British Metal pension transfer debacle, has been banned from acting as a director for 13 several years right after dropping purchasers £24 million.

Reynolds, 51, suggested hundreds of purchasers on the most effective way to spend their pension resources and, following his information, 288 transferred much more than £23 million into Self-invested Own Pension Techniques.

Their income was then put into a portfolio of high hazard, unregulated corporate bonds with no protection for traders from the Economic Providers Compensation Plan.

In the event, the FSCS did recompense them much more than £10 million but due to the fact of the £50,000 compensation cap, they nevertheless lost much more than £24 million.

The Insolvency Services investigated the organization, which went into liquidation in 2018, and declared in a statement these days: “Following Active Wealth’s liquidation, an Insolvency Company investigation discovered that concerning December 2014 and December 2016, Darren Reynolds experienced unsuccessful to act in the very best passions of the company’s clientele.”

Rob Clarke, main investigator at the Insolvency Assistance, mentioned: “Thirteen several years is a major ban and eradicating Darren Reynolds from the company arena will protect other investors from further damage for a lengthy interval of time.”

“This is a really unfortunate situation for these victims who thought Reynolds and his corporation was giving professional expenditure guidance in their very best passions, but in its place put their upcoming financial security in high hazard and unsuitable investments.”

The ban was requested in the Manchester Higher Court of Justice by DJ Obodai, meaning he can not specifically or indicrectly become involved in the “promotion, development or management of a company” without having authorization of the courtroom.

Energetic Prosperity was the to start with company to be banned from accomplishing pension transfers by the Monetary Carry out Authority right before it went into liquidation. Several of its clients were members of the British Metal Pension Scheme and were persuaded to make investments in the so-referred to as Portfolio 6 collection of large hazard bonds.

Al Rush, an IFA now encouraging British Metal pension holders recover their funds, reported: “Darren Reynolds ruined steelworkers’ life.

“He prised tough-performing guys and gals from their gold-plated described gain pensions. A 13 yr suspension. A 13 12 months suspension as a company director will make not the blindest bit of difference to a man who trampled more than the obligations of remaining one particular with willful abandon.

“It is now incumbent on the regulator to choose what lawful motion can now be taken towards this guy, and hopefully that he can be prosecuted and not authorized to profit from his things to do.”

The Portfolio 6 investments were being only to be bought to knowledgeable large net value or innovative traders but in at minimum 8 programs, the investigation located Reynolds had designed inaccurate declarations when describing his clients’ financial commitment practical experience and urge for food for fiscal threat.

Reynolds experienced claimed Lively Prosperity relied on the fund supervisor of Portfolio Six to do such owing diligence but the investigation stated he should have acknowledged that would not be neutral nor independent for the reason that the fund’s director have been affiliated with providers within the portfolio.

Reynolds has denied wrongdoing over British Steelworkers to MPs on the operate and pensions decide on committee and claimed he was not incentivised by fee payments to propose staff transfer out of company schemes.

Continue Reading