International
Khloe Kardashian responds to controversy over unedited picture
The reality TV star’s team tried to have the photograph, showing the 36-year-old standing by a pool in a leopard-print bikini, removed from social media.
It was unedited and featured Kardashian in a more natural light than followers of her Instagram page may be used to.
However, the attempts to take the picture down resulted in some fans sharing it more widely.
Kardashian has now responded to the controversy, saying her self-image has been battered by years of cruel comments online.
Khloe Kardashian – In pictures
She shared a video of herself wearing only bikini bottoms, hiding her chest with her arm and said it was to prove her body was not photoshopped.
Kardashian also posted a lengthy explanation of why she edits her pictures and said she would continue to do so.
She said while the unfiltered picture was “beautiful,” she had the right to ask for it to be removed.
Kardashian wrote: “In truth, the pressure, constant ridicule and judgement my entire life to be perfect and to meet other’s standards of how I should look has been too much to bear.
“‘Khloe is the fat sister.’ ‘Khloe is the ugly sister’. ‘Her dad must not be her real dad because she looks so different’ ‘The only way she could have lost that weight must have been from surgery.’
Kardashian said she was not asking for sympathy but “to be acknowledged for being human”.
She wrote that she tries to “live my life as honestly as possible and with empathy and kindness”, adding “it’s almost unbearable trying to live up to the impossible standards that the public have all set for me”.
Kardashian, mother to two-year-old daughter True, said she had been conditioned to feel she was unattractive after years of criticism.
She compared Instagram filters, good lighting and editing to makeup and having her nails done, and said she used them to “present myself to the world the way I want to be seen and it’s exactly what I will continue to do unapologetically”.
Kardashian added: “My body, my image and how I choose to look and what I want to share is my choice. It’s not for anyone to decide or judge what is acceptable or not anymore.”
The final slide of her post was a message for her fans.
She wrote: “We are all unique and perfect in our own way. Whichever way one chooses to be seen. I have realised that we cannot continue to live life trying to fit into the perfect mold of what others have set for us.
“Just do you and make sure your heart is happy.”
Her sister Kim Kardashian sent a message of support in the comments.
She wrote: “I love you Khloe.”
erek Chauvin “had to know” he was putting George Floyd’s daily life in threat for the duration of the arrest, a prosecutor explained during closing arguments at the police officer’s murder trial.
“Use your prevalent feeling. Believe that your eyes. What you observed, you saw,” Steve Schleicher instructed the jury on Monday.
He was referring to the online video of Mr Floyd pinned to the pavement with Chauvin’s knee on or close to his neck for up to 9 minutes, 29 seconds.
Chauvin’s lawyer Eric Nelson countered by arguing that Chauvin did what any “acceptable” police officer would have done right after finding himself in a “dynamic” and “fluid” predicament involving a large gentleman having difficulties with a few police officers.
As Mr Nelson began speaking, Chauvin removed his Covid-19 mask in front of the jury for one particular of pretty couple periods for the duration of the demo.
The duelling arguments bought underneath way with Minneapolis on edge immediately after Mr Floyd’s demise very last spring established off protests in the metropolis and throughout the US that at times turned violent.
The defence contends not only that Chauvin acted moderately but that 46-year-outdated Mr Floyd died of heart condition and illegal drug use, not Chauvin’s steps.
Underneath the legislation, police are presented certain latitude to use force and their steps are supposed to be judged according to what a “realistic officer” in the similar situation would have completed – a issue the defence pressured repeatedly.
Mr Nelson mentioned that officers who first went to the shop where Mr Floyd allegedly tried out to move a counterfeit 20 dollar notice had been by now having difficulties with Mr Floyd when Chauvin arrived as back again-up.
The law firm also noted that the initially two officers on the scene were being rookies and that law enforcement experienced been informed Mr Floyd may well be on drugs.
“A realistic police officer understands the depth of the battle,” Mr Nelson explained, declaring Chauvin’s system-worn digital camera and his law enforcement badge were knocked off his upper body.
For the duration of prosecution arguments, Mr Schleicher replayed parts of the bystander video clip and other footage as he dismissed specified defence theories about Mr Floyd’s dying as “nonsense”, indicating Chauvin killed Mr Floyd by constricting his respiratory.
Mr Schleicher turned down the drug overdose argument, as effectively as the competition that law enforcement ended up distracted by hostile onlookers, that Mr Floyd experienced “superhuman” strength from a state of agitation recognized as “enthusiastic delirium”, and that he experienced achievable carbon monoxide poisoning from exhaust fumes.
The prosecutor sarcastically referred to the idea that it was heart disorder that killed Mr Floyd as an “astounding coincidence”.
“Is that widespread sense or is that nonsense?” Mr Schleicher requested the racially numerous jury.
But Mr Nelson claimed the prosecution brought in authorities to give evidence that Mr Floyd died because of asphyxia, or lack of oxygen, though the individual who carried out the publish-mortem, the county clinical examiner, attained a diverse acquiring.
Hennepin County medical examiner Dr Andrew Baker, who ruled the loss of life a homicide, explained Mr Floyd’s coronary heart gave out simply because of the way police held him down. He detailed Mr Floyd’s drug use and underlying overall health issues as contributing elements.
Mr Nelson also showed the jury photographs of supplements uncovered in Mr Floyd’s vehicle and remnants learned in the patrol vehicle. Fentanyl and methamphetamine were being uncovered in Mr Floyd’s process.
Previously, Mr Schleicher described how Chauvin dismissed Mr Floyd’s cries and ongoing to kneel on him effectively following he stopped respiration and experienced no pulse.
Chauvin was “on top of him for nine minutes and 29 seconds and he experienced to know”, Mr Schleicher explained.
He mentioned Chauvin “read him, but he just didn’t listen”.
The prosecutor more argued that Mr Floyd was “not a menace to any one” and was not seeking to escape when he struggled with officers. As a substitute, Mr Schleicher explained, he was terrified of being put into the very small back again seat of the police car or truck.
He explained a acceptable officer with Chauvin’s education and working experience – he was a 19-calendar year Minneapolis law enforcement veteran – should really have sized up the situation accurately.
Chauvin, donning a light grey go well with with a blue shirt and blue tie, showed tiny expression as he viewed himself and the other officers pinning Mr Floyd to the floor on bodycam video played by his attorney.
Mr Schleicher also pointed out that Chauvin was essential to use his instruction to give clinical care to Mr Floyd but disregarded bystanders, rebuffed aid from an off-duty paramedic and turned down a recommendation from a further officer to roll Mr Floyd on to his facet.
“He could have listened to the bystanders. He could have listened to fellow officers. He could have listened to his personal instruction. He realized far better. He just failed to do superior,” said Mr Schleicher, including that even a 9-calendar year-old bystander understood it was risky.
“Acutely aware indifference. Indifference. Do you want to know what indifference is and appears like?” Mr Schleicher requested in advance of actively playing a movie of Chauvin replying “Uh-huh” several instances as Mr Floyd cried out.
The prosecution took about an hour and 45 minutes to make its situation, with Mr Schleicher declaring at the conclusion: “This wasn’t policing. This was murder.”
Mr Nelson, in his closing argument, performed portions of bystander video clip that confirmed the ever more agitated onlookers shouting at Chauvin to get off Mr Floyd’s neck. He claimed officers may perhaps have decided it was not risk-free to render health care support to Mr Floyd in that natural environment.
Chauvin, 45, is billed with next-degree murder, 3rd-diploma murder and 2nd-degree manslaughter. All a few costs involve the jury to conclude that Chauvin’s steps have been a “significant causal factor” in Mr Floyd’s loss of life and that his use of drive was unreasonable.
Second-diploma intentional murder carries up to 40 years in prison, third-degree murder 25 years, and second-diploma manslaughter 10 several years.
Photo8 months agoKavya Thapar Gallery
Photo8 months agoRaai Laxmi Pics
Photo8 months agoGehna Spicy Pics
Photo8 months agoShraddha Kapoor Gallery
Photo8 months agoVarshini Sounderajan Gallery
Photo8 months agoSreemukhi Gallery
Photo8 months agoTwiinkle Saaj Gallery
Photo8 months agoRashmi Gautam Stills