‘Stroke’: Nitin Kumar Gupta refutes allegations of ‘trying to make a fast buck’ designed by Rahul Roy’s loved ones | Bollywood Bubble

Image Source – Instagram

Rahul Roy and director Nitin Kumar Gupta have generally been near. In actuality, Rahul has starred in various films helmed by the latter like ‘Sayonee’, ‘Walk’, and many others. Kumar has also mentioned that Rahul will be starring in his next film titled ‘Stroke’. Though Rahul was taking pictures for Nitin’s ‘LAC: Stay The Struggle In Kargil’, a several days back when he suffered from a stroke and experienced to be airlifted to Srinagar and brought to Mumbai. After that, there was an posting doing the rounds the place two individuals, Priyanka and Romeer, who declare to be Rahul’s sister and brother-in-law, have alleged that not only does Rahul have nothing at all to do with the film ‘Stroke’ but have also accused Nitin of hoping to garner publicity by producing a movie about a stroke affected person and “dancing on their tragedy”.

Rahul Roy also spoke just lately to Bollywood Bubble. Look at out the entire discussion suitable below:

Nonetheless, Nitin strongly refutes these claims. He commences off by declaring that both equally Priyanka and Romeer are not seriously who they say they are. “The write-up reports Priyanka as Rahul’s sister and Romeer as his brother-in-law which is bogus. Rahul has only fulfilled both of those of them 2-3 a long time back again,” he says, including, “The posting also suggests that my movie ‘Stroke’ would essay Rahul as a paralytic patient, which is false. The role is of a stroke target without having any paralysis elements in any respect.

In the aforementioned posting Priyanka also claims that Rahul’s twin brother Rohit, who stays in the US, organized for 6 commandoes as a result of a brigadier to go and see Rahul and it was only after that that he was airlifted to Srinagar and introduced to Mumbai. Nonetheless, Nitin suggests that none of this is genuine. “Priyanka mentions six commandos who went to see Rahul. This is untrue. My output individual and actor Vishal Sharma took Rahul Roy to Army Medical center and Kargil District Clinic for CT scan. As quickly as I returned from the shoot that day, I took him to the district medical center myself for even further checkup,” he states, including, “I wrote to the Kargil district justice of the peace Mr Basheer for helicopter permission instantly and as quickly as he gave authorization, I paid for Rahul’s helicopter airlift to Srinagar and flight to Mumbai. There was no military involvement and no commandos had been concerned in the procedure.

Priyanka has also claimed that Nitin was not responding to her phone calls. Having said that, Nitin suggests that he was in touch with Rahul’s brother all through. “Priyanka claims I was not responding to her calls but the fact is that she in no way identified as and most of our filming areas ended up off-community. I really don’t have any skipped get in touch with intimation from her whatsoever, neither on cellphone nor on Whatsapp. I had been continuously in contact with Rahul’s twin brother Rohit,” he clarifies.

Both of those Romeer and Priyanka have questioned Nitin’s assert that Rahul is element of his upcoming film Stroke. Having said that, Nitin claims that Rahul has provided him the consent to cast him in all of his films, without the need of in search of his authorization every time. “On no matter if I have Rahul’s authorization to forged him in Stroke or not, I have filmed 4 films with Rahul Roy – Sayonee, Stroll, L.A.C and Death of an Ambassador. I am not a person who desires to make a rapid buck on his identify, but a person who has stood by him and turned down other actors for him. Rahul himself has said that he will be element of any movie I make and has jokingly threatened me not to make any film without him. So, in reality, I do have blanket authorization from him to forged him in any movie that I make,” he suggests.

Also Read through: Rahul Roy’s loved ones blasts filmmaker Nitin Kumar Gupta for asserting ‘Stroke’ with no the former’s consent